REVIEW: Hobie Horizontal Rod Holder

 

Shortest review ever:  Broke while installing – hell I was just seeing if the strap would make it over the butt of my halibut rod.  Better to break in the grass than on the ocean though, would suck to lose that setup.

 

 

REVIEW: Olympus TG-820

 

Sometimes you’re just in the right place at the right time saying the right thing. Right after I posted Gear Lust: Waterproof Cameras I was contacted by Staples and told they wanted to send me a ‘ruggedized’ camera for some real-world testing.

“Word?”
“Word.”

I explained to them that I’m not a photographer like Tim Zimmerman and thus won’t be able (nor want) to do an in-depth, nerd out to pixels under a microscope dpreview-esque review, to which they replied they were OK with and wanted the Joe the Plumber version anyways. The deal was signed in blood and a week later an Olympus TG-820 shows up at my doorstep.
 
 
MARKETING

“Dunk it, Drop it, Freeze it, Crush it! True worry-free shooting regardless of the situation. Whether you’re diving, hiking, skiing, biking or climbing, Olympus’ Lifeproof technologies give you the freedom to capture your adventures from a whole new perspective.”

 
Full features and specs can be found here.
 
 

Blue TG-820 in all her beauty


 
 
FIRST IMPRESSION
DAMN, this thing is heavier than I expected. Nice looking piece of kit, between the brushed and anodized blue case and large screen on back.
 
 
TESTING CRITERIA
As most consumers looking at this camera will likely be using it as a phonecam replacement my testing criteria was simple: bring the camera with me for a week and snap photos using it when I’d usually reach for the iPhone (or in places I wouldn’t want to bring the iPhone). Genius, right? Took me hours to come up with that.
 
 
THE PHOTOS
All shots are straight out of the camera, no sharpening or other post-processing. The first shot I took as I was in the backyard was a quick P&S of the dog and was impressed with the output. After a few more shots in full light I was stoked. The TG-820 definitely takes great photos in fully lit situations, and zooming in on Jasmine’s schnozzle you can see it captures a decent amount of detail.
 

I’ll see that rope again…


 

 
 
 
Cheers at Oregon Brew Fest. The light was a bit odd in the tent and I’d say the camera captured it relatively accurately.


 
 
 
Group shot. Definitely a touch soft (part of which can be attributed to Photobucket’s hosting, the two above are on Flickr), and the details (especially darker/shade) are a bit grainy at full size.

The ladies getting wet

 
SPECIAL MODES
I hatehatehate (yes, that’s hate^3) all the ‘special’ (aka instragram/hipstamatic type crap) modes that most consumer P&S cameras have built in but I AM a sucker for macro shots, the only mode I played with. When I heard the TG-820′s super macro mode had a 1cm minimum focus distance I was stoked to give ‘er a go. For the below I simply chose the mode, stuck my hand into a tomato plant and clicked the shutter. The full-size image shows a surprising amount of detail.
 

Tomato plant shot using macro mode


 
 

Zoom (but not full size crop)


 
 
VIDEO
Shooting video with the TG-820 is easy, just push the orange button on the back and you’re recording. When the focus nails it the video quality is good enough for the web (aka 99.99% of all uses this camera will see), but the focus does tend to wander a bit in video mode. Also the camera does pick up quite a bit of camera noise and hand holding noise, most likely due to the microphone placement. I found that some of the vids I shot were unlistenable due to the sound of my hand holding it scraping against the mic area. Like with old school DV cams can probably just put a band-aid over it to ‘soften’ the noise it picks up. The vid below is just a quick dunk in the Pacific to give an idea of the output.

Kelp Vid from Justin H on Vimeo.

 
 
One downside I noticed is that after submerging the camera the lens doesn’t shed water, often resulting in pictures with ‘blobs’ from the water on the lens. I also had a few issues where the lens was fogged after using it in the water, putting it in my pocket, than taking it out awhile later to snap a pic. The high-end Olympus TG-1 has a water-repellent coating on the lens and monitor, something I think Olympus should apply to ANY camera billed as waterproof.

No, this is not a failed attempt at a fake tilt-shift image


 

TAP CONTROL
One of the features I found innovative was the Olympus TG-820′s ‘Tap Control’. Tap Control let’s you scroll through the menu using taps on the sides of the camera as opposed to the pencil eraser sized D-pad. It’s simple and intuitive to use – tap on the top of the camera to move down on the menu, tap on the left or right sides of the camera to scroll left and right on the menu, and tap on the bottom of the camera to scroll back up – and will come in handy with gloved hands.
 

SUMMARY
The Olympus TG-820 is a camera that is easy to live with day-to-day and makes a great, rugged replacement for your smartphone. If all you are doing is snapping photos/vids for the web you can buy this and be immediately stoked. That being said, it’s not without it’s downsides – of course if you are just looking for a rugged smartphone camera replacement you’d be dealing with the same downsides on your phone so it’s a wash.

POSITIVES:
Great picture quality in fully lit situations
High resolution rear screen
Costs less than a replacement phone
Rugged
Waterproof

NEGATIVES:
Focus struggles in certain situations
Some noise in darker areas of images
The double locking mechanism sometimes unlocks one of two locks on it’s own (never had the camera door open though)
Battery life felt shorter than expected (no hard stat to back this claim up other than shot ~100 photos and ~5 minutes of video and it was already blinking)

I’d like to thank Staples for giving me the camera post-review. Siiiiiick.

First look: Rockymounts Pitchfork car rack

 

Convinced the world’s slowest mountain biker that since I shuttle us to all our rides that she should use our REI F&F coupon to pick up bike racks for the roof of the blackhawk. Hate Thule with a passion after they refused to honor their warranty on a faulty product years ago (in fact they actually accused me of lying about ever having the surfboard I said I lost since I had no receipt for it….apparently filing a report with the state patrol isn’t enough…), and the Yakima stuff looks nice but the Rockymounts (out of Boulder, CO) caught my circa-1997 Honda Civic pimping eye with their color selections.

It checked most of my needs out of the box – works with standard Yakima racks, no adapter needed for disc brakes, ability to lock, same price or cheaper than the competitors. Two things that aren’t a current issue for me but should be noted 1) Rockymounts list a max weight of 35 lbs per channel (that’s low for you downhillers) and 2) for thru axle you have to purchase a separate adapter that costs about what I paid for the racks! Lame.

Anyways, order placed, two days later arrived at our local store, installed.

First impression out of the box: Siiiiiiick! Nice powdercoated finish, wheel channel feels substantial. Wheel channels look short, but they aren’t (fit my 21″ frame 29er no probs). Would prefer rear wheel strap to be ratcheting as that just seems more secure (even though I know it’s not).

Install process: Easy. Three screws (they include the allen key you’ll need for two of ‘em), two key insertions, done. The only issue I ran into during the process was one of the QR levers wouldn’t unlock. Pinged them via the twitters and they said to call them and they’d walk me through the removal and reinsertion process. They walked me through it, didn’t work the first time, I played with it for a bit and got ‘er.

Installed impression: Looks sick. Very low profile. The little detail of powdercoated color really makes the rack and will help me find my generic Portland vehicle (Subaru wagon) from the rest of the generic Portland vehicles in the parking lot. Seems odd that the rack only locks to the crossbars in the front, with the rear being a hand tightened wing nut, though maybe they all do that? In the end one lock should be more than enough though.

Nice rack

Final first impression: Thus far have only used the rack once to transport my bike to a ride. Loading/unloading is the same process as any other fork mount rack and easy unless you’re a midget. Gets to be a little difficult getting a perfect tight fit on the dropouts due to the room you have to work with to spin the plastic handle then trying to close it, but it’s a minor inconvenience. When the bike is locked on the rack it seems like there’s more side-to-side play in the fork mount than I’d expect (see shaky video above), though maybe it’s like buildings in quake zones and they are built to sway to dissipate energy? Also noticed a lot of creaks and moans coming from the rear attachment area when driving, I’m hoping that goes away with time and it’s just the parts settling in. Time will tell, and will have an updated full review once I’ve had more time to use everything.

Rockymounts not available at your local shop? Check out the selection at REI and backcountry.com.

REVIEW: Wusthof Grand Prix knives

 

(This review is only snow/outdoors related in that it will keep me from riding the next few days)

Sharper than Charlie Sheen’s wit. They cut garlic lightning quick.

Lightsaber sharp. I don’t mean that in a ‘cut your dead tauntaun guts/smells bad inside’ way

I’m talking more like Darth Vader to your Obi-Wan

Kinda like Obi’s robe when he got cut down, no?

my finger went from girl to woman last night

Injured reserve for a week or two

Yup, pulled the ultimate bonehead move last night, turned my finger into a flip top. Hopefully 10 piece knife set and 10 digits is just a coincidence. Ruined my night of watching free fights with some good new beer, and while Obama might be paying for my gas and mortgage he didn’t pay for my stitches and tetanus shot. Perspective though, it’s only 10 days assuming the piece grows back on, if not I guess it’s skin graft. That’ll be cheap. Word.

Mud = fun. Cutting finger tip off = not fun

Down sweater battle: Mountain Hardwear Nitrous v. Patagonia Down Sweater

 

I’ve been refining and updating my gear lately (which is a bit odd given the lack of income), and recently acquired both the ever popular Patagonia Down Sweater and the Mountain Hardwear Nitrous down sweater. Let’s get these two into the ring and see who is left standing!

Quick overview:

Current champ: Patagonia Down Sweater:
Probably the most popular thing in Patagonia’s product line, odds are you or one of your friends owns this jacket. The Patagonia uses a DWR coated, windproof and 100% recycled polyester ripstop shell with 800 fill power down. The Patagucci also sports two zippered external fleece lined pockets and a zippered internal mesh stretchy pocket that doubles as a stuff sack that you can never lose. Elastic cuffs and a drawcord waist complete the Patagonia’s features.

Challenger: Mountain Hardwear Nitrous
The Mountain Hardwear Nitrous down sweater doesn’t have the storied history and popularity of the Patagonia, but is a fine jacket nonetheless. The Nitrous uses Mountain Hardwear’s ‘Ecosensor Ripstop’ for it’s shell, and 800 fill down. Ecosensor is a DWR coated ripstop polyester consisting of 13% (not 12%…not 14%, but 13) recycled polyester. Like the ‘gucci the Nitrous sports two external handwarmer pockets, however they are non-zippered. The Nitrous also has an external zippered chest pocket and chamois lined collar to eliminate zipper rub on your windburned face. Elastic cuffs, waist drawcord and easy to lose (not permanently attached) stuff sack round out the Mountain Hardwear’s features.

Weigh in:
Patagonia claims a 12.4 oz average weight and gives no fill weight. However, they do mention their fabric is 1.4 oz./yard, so we’ll assume it’s an average fill weight of 11 oz. Mountain Hardwear claims an average weight of 12 oz. for the Nitrous, and the EcoSensor weighs in at 1 oz./yard, so we’ll assume 11 oz. of fill as well. I don’t have a scale, but I can say they both feel damn light. Anecdotally I’d say the Patagonia outer fabric FEELS more substantial and up to abuse, but as I haven’t had an issue with either that’s just me talking about my ass. Both shells leak about the same amount of feathers, so no advantage to either.

Round 1: Place of manufacture
Both garments are made in China. Let’s take a minute to celebrate the irony that is the American consumer’s desire for low priced products, thus driving manufacturing offshore, while simultaneously complaining about jobs lost to foreign countries.
10-10 round (yeah, when’s the last time you saw a 10:10 round?)

Round 2: Features
The Patagonia uses a 100% recycled shell AND is windproof. Because I’m fond of Earth I say advantage Patagonia by way of 100% being greater than 13%.
Both use 800 fill power down. Even.
Both have elastic cuffs, drawcord hem and lined pockets. Even.
The Patagonia has zippered external pockets, the Mountain Hardwear does not. Since one of the pocket zips on my Patagonia Down Sweater vest blew out within a week of owning I’m giving this one to Mountain Hardwear
The Nitrous has a chamois lined chin, Patagonia does not. Advantage MH.
Stuff sack – can’t lose the ‘gucci, the MH’s you can. Advantage ‘gucci, though I’m gonna say it doesn’t count for much because the MH basically nets me a stuff sack I can use for other purposes.
This was a close round, but I’m going to give it to MH by way of not being a fan of the ‘gucci zips and the fleece lined collar. 10-9 round.

Final round: Fit
Fit is where the Nitrous KILLS it over the Patagonia for me. I’m about 6’4, 200 lbs, and the Patagonia just fits boxy, like plastic bag, whereas the Mountain Hardwear has a nice athletic cut. However, if you were built more like a fireplug and less like a swimmer the Patagonia may be more up your alley. 10-8 round and pure domination by Mountain Hardwear for my body type, YMMV.

Final score:
While the Patagonia Down Sweater put up a good fight with it’s 100% recycled and windproof shell, the Mountain Hardwear ultimately took a close fight with it’s total domination in fit. 30-27, final. Honestly though, you can’t go wrong with either jacket. Both have lifetime warranties and are well made, it really comes down to fit (and possibly color options).

As everyone has seen both of these items I’ll just throw a couple quick unscientific pics up highlighting the sizing (sorry can’t try ‘em on and shoot a photo for fit comparisons as I broke my tripod) differences. Note that both are size large.

Extra body width on Patagonia v. Mountain Hardwear

Extra body width on Patagonia v. Mountain Hardwear

A little extra length in the sleeves on the Nitrous

A little extra length in the sleeves on the Nitrous

A little extra body length is nice when youre an orangutan

A little extra body length is nice when you're built like an orangutan

 

UPDATE 10/14/11:  As this post is still getting traffic but is from an old sale I put a gear finder search box up on the top right rail to help you find any items on sale.  Just go up there, type in what you’re looking for and click search and a list of items and prices matching your criteria will show up.  Should help you quickly find what you want at the best possible price!

 

2/20/11: Threw together this (admittedly ugly) widget to help you quickly/easily find either of the two down sweaters on sale. Figure the prices were changing so much was hard for me to keep up with single links. Note that the colors shown are just samples and that they will likely have a bunch more in stock.

Patagonia Down Sweater

Mountain Hardwear Nitrous

 

First look: Stoic Bombshell jacket

 

Been doing some serious gear whoring the past week or so as biz locally was going good for a bit.  Was.  Ahh well, at least I’ve got some new gear to show for it.

First up, the Stoic Bombshell jacket.  Stoic is the new name for the house brand gear from backcountry.com, and from what I can tell thus far this stuff is a serious bargain. As I just received my jacket a few days ago I can’t give it a full review, but as of right now my impressions are that even at full price this stuff is worth it (and this coming from a guy that can’t recall the last time he bought ANYTHING full price).

The marketing department had this to say:

The undaunted Stoic Bombshell Jacket signs on for summit pushes, hut-to-hut tours, and anything between. Slightly stretchy, 3-layer Bombshell material offers shelter from ridgeline gales and whipping spin drift, while thumb-holed hand gaiters and a fully-adjustable hood ensure a complete seal from the elements. Fully-welded seams increase the Bombshell’s breathability over standard taped-seam shells and mesh-backed underarm vents banish excess body heat during long boot packs. The Stoic Bombshell’s internal pocket with headphone port begs for some musical accompaniment. Stoic’s 3-D ergonomic fit offers un-inhibited mobility without drowning you in excess fabric—if you tend to like a roomier fit, size up.</p></blockquote> <p>A few quick pics to get the party started. Once I’ve had a chance to use it to do more than walk from Deschutes to Rogue to Bridgeport and back I’ll give my full review.

This jacket is the bomb...shell
This jacket is the bomb…shell
Waterproof zipper close up, with wide angle lens shadow thrown in for ambiance

Waterproof zipper close up, with wide angle lens shadow thrown in for ambiance

Wings spread

Wings spread

Gaping pit zips

Gaping pit zips

Mesh lined pocket and headphone port

Mesh lined pocket and headphone port

Left internal pocket detail

Left internal pocket detail

Removable powder skirt with attachment zipper and snaps

Removable powder skirt with attachment zipper and snaps

You can call me dirty and then zip off your skirt

You can call me dirty and then zip off your skirt

Seriously well thought out jacket.  Wrist cuffs with small stretch panels.

Seriously well thought out jacket. Wrist cuffs with small stretch panels.

Let me know if you have any questions on the jacket, want to see some additional angles/close ups, or if there’s anything in particular you want me to pay attention to while I test it out.

UPDATE:
Saw this code for 30% off on the Stoic stuff. 4KZ-1-G3JU6

Review: Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 sleeping bag

 

It’s been awhile since I’ve done any gear reviews. Between a move back to the Pacific Northwest, working on getting a startup off the ground and enjoying the local beer scene I haven’t been outdoors as much as I’d like outside of daytrips v. last summer when I spent every weekend somewhere in the Sierra. So, first up in a list of long overdue reviews is this review of the Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 bag.

Stock photo from Mountainhardwear.com

Stock photo from Mountainhardwear.com

Overview
Their most popular down bag, the Phantom 32 is one of the many bags Mountain Hardwear makes at this temperature rating. Every bag in the Phantom line is targeted more towards the fast and light crowd due to their use of weight saving 800 fill down and .85 oz./yard nylon shell and design considerations such as a snug mummy cut and 2/3 length zipper, and this one is no different. The Phantom 32 comes in at 1 lb. 8 oz. (11 oz. of which are down) for the long version (at 80″ the long gets you 6″ more inside length, 2″ more diameter in the shoulders and the footbox), weighing in less than a similarly rated Montbell Down Hugger #3, and only a few ounces more than the UL crowd uber-hyped (and IMO uber-ridiculous, though admittedly I’ve never tried one so for all I know they could be the bee’s knees) Jacks R Better quilt.

A few other details (and when it comes to bags the devil really is in the details) of the Phantom 32 that may get missed when glancing the racks at your local retailer are:

• Tight 5″ baffle spacing creates optimal loft
• Lightweight two-way zipper for easy entry and exit
• Six-chamber hood design maintains even loft around head for consistent warmth
• Down-filled face gasket comfortably blocks drafts at the hood opening
• Ergonomic draft collar blocks the escape of heated air from inside the bag. The two-piece collar drapes naturally over neck and shoulders creating a soft comfortable seal. Two draw cords can snug down as needed to secure the collar.
• Insulated draft tube with anti-snag panel prevents cold spots along zipper
• Comfort Footbox follows natural foot position for maximum warmth and comfort
• Single-handed drawcords simplify adjustments
• Nylon mesh storage sack and stuff sack included

Build
Overall, the Phantom 32 feels well built and similar to other mainstream manufacturers high-end bags. I wouldn’t say it has the same quality feel of a more boutique brand such as Western Mountaineering or Feathered Friends, but overall it’s a well built and on par with its peers.

Performance thus far
I was a bit hesitant when deciding on this as my two/three season bag as I tend to sleep warm and went back and forth on the 32 v. 45 bag, and also wasn’t sure if I’d be too constrained by the fit on hot summer nights. I liked the thought of the weight savings and pack space savings v. my (realllly) old synthetic bag and ended up deciding to go with the 32 as worst case scenario I could use it as a quilt over me if I got too hot. In the end I’m glad I did. The stuffed size of the bag is ridiculous (check the pic below!), and it’s significantly warmer than my old ’30 degree’ synth bag – which actually came in handy on an unexpectedly cold night in the alpine a few weeks back.

Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 with Sigg bottle for size comparison

Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 with Sigg bottle for size comparison

Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 with Sigg bottle

Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 with Sigg bottle

Another hesitation I had when deciding on this bag was the fact that I knew I’d be eventually relocating to the Pacific Northwet, and down and rain don’t typically play well together. I actually slept under only a small tarp (rainfly from a Hennessy Hammock I couldn’t setup due to lack of strong trees…) in a downpour and while the outside of the bag was damp due to condensation from my breath and the wind driving the rain under the tarp the DWR kept the bag from soaking through – though it’s not something you’d want to do regularly, and especially not if you were expecting multiple days of rain with no chance to dry your gear if it did soak through.

Overall the bag has performed as expected, though I’ve yet to experience any nights near it’s temperature rating. The only issue I’ve got with the bag thus far is the zipper. For some reason the damn thing doesn’t want to let me out of the bag half the time, and the anti-snag panel doesn’t live up to it’s name. I’d gladly take another ounce of pack weight if it meant I’d get some stiffer material along the zipper to keep it from snagging the shell fabric as I’m worried that one day the snag is going to result in a tear. The shell fabric is wispy enough that you can hold it up to a bright light and essentially see through it.

Got this zipper snag when taking the bag out and unzipping it.  Seems like a frequent occurence with this bag.

Got this zipper snag when taking the bag out and unzipping it. Seems like a frequent occurence with this bag.

That being said, if you’re looking for a well made, lightweight bag that stuffs down to the size of a Nalgene bottle that regularly goes on sale for under $225 I’d definitely recommend taking a look at the Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32.

If you can’t find it locally you can pick up the Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 online at the usual suspects. Threw together the little widget below to hopefully help you find it on sale quickly.

First Look: Mountain Hardwear Koa 55 pack

 

In an odd stroke of timing I was talking about wanting to try the Mountain Hardwear Koa 55 early last week. It really seems like a good mix of light (though not ultralight by any stretch) and feature filled. Fast forward to Friday and I discovered MH was doing their semi-annual warehouse sale, which also allows mere mortals such as myself to shop their employee store. As I’m a dedicated blogger I decided I should sacrifice some of my hard earned money to buy some new gear to review (read as: it was blowing 35+ at the coast so surfing/kayaking didn’t sound like much fun) for everyone.

So, as I’m in the process of packing/moving and won’t be able to take the pack out for at least two weeks I wanted to post some pics up for anyone else considering the pack. Seems like there was a bit of hype surrounding this pack in all the buyer’s guides this year, but I haven’t been able to find much in the way of real-world images or reviews.

Mountain Hardwear Koa 55

Mountain Hardwear Koa 55

Main pocket on Koa 55, with rolltop (think: drybag) closure

Main pocket on Koa 55, with rolltop (think: drybag) closure

Small external pocket with key loop

Small external pocket with key loop

Side access (on both sides) to main pocket

Side access (on both sides) to main pocket

Stowaway mesh helmet carrier

Stowaway mesh helmet carrier

Bottom access to pack.  Yes, there are a lot of zippers on the pack.

Bottom access to pack. Yes, there are a lot of zippers on the pack.

Mesh backpanel.  Most stoked for this as my old Gregory is WARM

Mesh backpanel. Most stoked for this as my old Gregory is WARM

A friendly little LNT reminder

A friendly little LNT reminder

That’s all for now. As always, if there’s a question about the product, or an angle you want photographed, lemme know. I apologize for the pics being a bit blown out, don’t have the time to edit the levels/curves on ‘em.

If you can’t find it locally, the Mountain Hardwear Koa 55 is available online at all the usual suspects. The widget below should enable you to quickly see who has it and at what price. As always I recommend you try and shop at your local outdoor equipment retailer. If you don’t support them first you’ll have nobody to blame but yourself if there comes a time where you can’t go look/feel equipment locally before buying.

Reviews and first looks coming ‘soon’:
Mountain Hardwear Koa 55 pack (duh)
Mountain Hardwear Phantom 32 bag – complete, click to read
Perception Search 15 (sit-on-top kayak)

Review: Westcomb Mirage jacket

 

It’s been awhile since I’ve fired up a review, and I’ve been sleeping on this one for awhile. Took the pics a few weeks back and just haven’t set aside the time to fire up some thoughts on the jacket.

Marketing speak
The Westcomb Mirage jacket is part of the Hardshell AX line of outerwear from (ex-Arcteryxers) the Canunckistani company Westcomb. Their marketing speak is brief and to the point on their site, stating merely

Stylish eVent® shell is a superb all-mountain piece engineered for any on-or-off mountain activities requiring protection from the harshest conditions.

Fit
I purchased the jacket in an XL, which according to their size chart should fit someone with a 17″ neck, 47″ chest, 41″ waist and an ‘overall length’ of 35″. Not sure what the overall length measurement is, but possibly the sleeve length?

My biggest issue with the jacket is the fit. Given the intended use of the jacket (note that the Hardshell AX line is promoted by an image of a guy rappelling) I’d assume it to have a relatively slender, efficient cut, with some added sleeve length for when you’re reaching above your head. Instead you get a very boxy, short bodied jacket with sleeves longer than you’d expect for the body, yet still not long enough. I feel like the body length and sleeve length are non-complimentary, and both could stand to be longer (c’mon Canada, I know you’re a bunch of overgrown milk drinkers like myself!). The body could also be a bit narrower in my opinion – I feel like rather than catering to the athletic it’s built to cater to the McDonalds eaters out there.

Westcomb Mirage body shot

Westcomb Mirage body shot

Build
One place that I feel Westcomb really nails it is build quality. There are very few garments I’ve come in contact with that give off the same feeling of quality as the Westcombs that I’ve dealt with.

For the Mirage jacket Westcomb kept it simple, including only what you need to get up and down the mountain and leaving out the extras you don’t. A few mini toggles on the hood/collar, velcro on the wrists, internal and external pockets, and waterproof zips all around. No pit zips on this eVent jacket, and in my experience their unnecessary (and I am one of the heaviest sweaters around). I know everyone says that about eVent, and I had my initial doubts given my sweaty nature, but I’ve yet to get anything more then slightly damp in this jacket – and this is coming from someone that used to drip sweat and be soaked to the bone. I’m a believer.

Performance thus far
Outside of the fit issues I love this jacket. As mentioned above it’s far outperformed anything I’ve ever owned for getting sweat out and away, and it crumples down to the size of nothing. Keeps the rain and snow out like nobody’s business to where it’s my go-to rain jacket as well. My only complaint this thus far (and the reason I’ll probably be one of ‘those guys’ and abuse a certain online retailers return policy…) is the fit. The body needs to be a touch longer and a touch narrower, and the sleeves need a bit of length added as well. Yes, I’m a mongoloid, but I feel like usually the techie garments are built for mongoloids.

As always, if you have any questions/comments about the garment drop it in the comments or email me at justin@poormansheli.com and I’ll get back to you.

Westcomb Mirage internal pocket

Westcomb Mirage internal pocket

Hood toggle

Hood toggle

Zipper tucked into its cover

Zipper tucked into it's cover

If not available to you locally you can pick up Westcomb products at a few online vendors, though neither have a terribly deep selection. Backcountry.com and Oregon Mountain Community both carry Westcomb and are good retailers, though like always I suggest trying to give your local shop the biz first.

Photo sneak preview: Osprey Kode 38 pack

 

Dying tonight in our heatwave (RIP snow) and melting on the couch figured I’d snap a few pics of the Osprey Kode 38 that recently came into my possession. I’ve only got two days on the pack so want to hold off giving any real review yet as I’m still getting used to the Kode v. my tried and true Dakine and there’s an obvious adjustment period needed. A couple first impressions/early thoughts:

  • The pack feels light. Not UL backpacker light, but feels lighter than my smaller Dakine. I don’t have a scale to verify whether I am/am not crazy.
  • Avy tool pocket needs some sort of shovel/blade pocket to keep items from shifting. There’s a small stretchy part inside the tool pocket but it wouldn’t hold any blade I’m aware of.
  • It’s not the quickest pack to access your non-avy gear as you’ve got to unbuckle two buckles before you can unzip the pack
  • The above being said the pack carries well (in part due to those buckles/load lifter straps), especially with a board on it, and feels compact on your back

If there are any angles/measurements/etc. you’d like to see let me know in the comments section and I’ll get’er done. Also, if you have any questions you’d like me to address in testing I’ll do my best. On to the pics.

Front view. Pack is empty thus it looks a bit flat. Will get better pics when I drop a review.

Osprey Kode 38 front view

Osprey Kode 38 front view

Back view

Osprey Kode back view

Osprey Kode and IKEA chair caught on film in hot steamy embrace

Back panel open. Threw a Downmat 7 in there to give some perspective to interior size.

Open up and say aaaaahhhh

Open up and say aaaaahhhh

Unlike the Kode 30 the avy tool pocket on the Kode 38 isn’t zippered.

Drawcord avy tool pocket closure

Drawcord avy tool pocket closure

Interior shot of avy tool pocket

Osprey Kode chewing with its mouth open (just like my co-workers...)

Osprey Kode chewing with it's mouth open (just like my co-workers...)

Nice zipper pulls

Pull my zipper

Pull my zipper

Buckles and load lifters

Osprey Kode buckles

Osprey Kode buckles

If you can’t find it at your local outdoors shop the Osprey Kode is available at a few online retailers. I’m trying something new by throwing a bunch of retailers in the below banner, hopefully helps you find the best price quickly and save you from clicking from site to site (I used to just have a big list of retailers here). Ping me with any feedback you’ve got on the widget.